Saturday, August 5, 2017


Intibah Kadi, 5 August, 2017

On July 4, 2016, Ghassan and I made the statement below after weathering months of fierce, targeted, dangerous and highly mischievous political attacks on us. These were aimed to silence the voice of Ghassan, the first Indigenous person from the Levant to write regularly in the English language on the War on Syria.

More than a year later, it has become much clearer as to what is going on in the on-line and media defence of Syria movement. It has basically been hijacked and diverted, much like the strategies we hear Soros does to existing movements.  An incredible irony took place; the initiator of the defamation campaign has written extensively on Hybrid Warfare and employed from that suite of strategies, tactics to silence Ghassan.

We have seen a line up of "friends" of Syria, eager to believe the fabrications against a good, patriotic, competent indigenous analyst such as "Ghassan Kadi". Who are these "friends" of Syria engaged in attempts to silence him? Over a year later, we can see who they all are. Almost without exception, they are all the "friends" of Syria who have made a name for themselves as "experts" on Syria or "activists" for Syria.  Some are just opportunists, but a number it seems have some serious questions attached to their names. The one connector, alarmingly, is that they all have turned on us and defended a proven Christian Zionist operative. Even one of them, who should have known better than to engage in such smears after relying on Ghassan Kadi to get him quickly up to speed on Syria, admitted how much of a teacher Ghassan had been to him and wrote this in the inside cover of his book for Ghassan.

True patriots like Ghassan are completely entitled to analyse difficult issues and offer their opinions and opinions are all they are. Nothing remains hidden forever. In time the President of Syria himself will hear the true story about the hijacking and subverting of the Syria social media defence movement and the story behind the analyst and writer of the book he received last July 2016.

Here is the original statement made over a year ago by Ghassan and myself.

By Intibah Kadi, July 4, 2016

Ghassan and I decided that we would make this statement as there are some curious claims and possibly some fabricated screenshots circulating around (which can be addressed later).

Our Identity.

*Most friends here on FB who have got close to me know my real name. Almost all who were reasonably close at least knew what country I lived... in. When in a situation of discussing our life and story, it matched exactly that of reality, but I might have said to some “I live in a Western country”. I often mentioned that we have a home in the “Levant” or specifically mentioned the name of the city and that we basically abandoned it and that is the truth. I never lied to anyone! In fact, compared to the majority on FB fighting for Syria I was very forthcoming about who I really am!

*I had the right to be vague about some personal details as is common in potentially dangerous activist work. Even I offered a few to know about me and they didn’t want to know (!) Ghassan about 6 months ago made a post where he invited anyone to pm him if they wanted to know our identity.

*So our ID is not a big secret from GOOD Syrians and their supporters.

*Naturally putting our names in a link on “global” settings on the page of a well known Syrian activist who is watched by the Takfiris was rather a devastating experience for us as we are from the region – from Syria and Lebanon. Ghassan has had many threats made to his life so this was not a good thing.

*Why such a need for the use of pseudonyms? Simple: because where we have a home it is now dangerous for us. We had to abandon it at the end of 2010. We had been planning to move our base to Damascus and spend half the year there and the other half in Australia. Where our home is, the city was filling up to the brim with Jihadists and a lot of community seemed to be getting increasingly radical. Those who did not like this just tried to keep quiet and invisible as the madness was carrying people along.

* Ghassan’s parents were secular people who were lifelong SSNP activists. The father was many times imprisoned and once for 4 years...ALL for trying to unite Lebanon back to Syria. His father insisted on staying in his city despite the growing radicalisation and that was an issue even decades ago.

*The Syrian connection? Both parents of Ghassan were born in Syria as per birth certificate: one remained a Syrian national and one got Lebanese citizenship after the Sykes Picot Agreement. So half the family are in Syria and the other half are in Lebanon.

*Being brought up in a SSNP family, Ghassan was always told he is Syrian and that is what all SSNP people say as they don’t recognise the Sykes-Picot Agreement. As the wife of European ethnicity, I am actually regarded in the SSNP community as “Syrian” but never ever have I told people I am Syrian! But I am part of that community.

*So we took on our pseudonyms and thought our unique perspectives would be very helpful, given our good English writing skills and straddling both societies. We have served the online-English speaking social media defence of Syria since 2011.

*I was admin of The Syrian Revolution; The Untold Story for 3 ½ years but Ghassan and I had a disagreement with the founder about the content and strategies regarding the group. The disagreement initially began after the other admin and I agreed to get rid of two disruptive members whose aim was to run down Syria’s allies, particularly Russia. The founder of the group was very unhappy about the removal of one person, a Syrian, who she added later on when I had gone. After that Ghassan and I, with a few friends, set up REDLINE SYRIA as many friends asked us to stay around and not leave FB.

Federalism Issue: Part One.

*I spoke out recently about a letter the HQ of the SSNP sent to an “analyst” in response to a most mischievous and potentially damaging article. The “analyst” was requested by the SSNP to post their letter publicly. That was done but in a twisted way to portray himself as not having done something wrong and to look like SSNP Head Office criticism of my husband which, given the “untold story” behind this, is most bizarre. Whether the SSNP officials contacted his employer or the Russian government or just him… I have no idea. However, because I poked the fire, the whole accusation of my husband Ghassan Kadi being a supporter of “Federalism” has surfaced again.

*A personal conversation I had with a Serbian in mid-March this year was posted in some Syrian groups as “proof” that Ghassan supports “Federalism” of Syria. My responses in that conversation actually go in Ghassan’s and my favour…of course! I wonder if anyone actually reads?

*I cut out the other person’s comments so that we can just focus on my answers. It all centred around the article my husband was about to publish on The Saker called “Syrian-Turkish Border Security: Check Point Taurus” and which was later on, in a bizarre twist, used as a document of “proof” to show the SSNP was doing the dirty on Syria! (See Federalism Issue Part Two below)

*If someone repeats lies often enough they begin to believe it as well as others! It seems that if we say “A” then the detractor says we said “Z” or if we say “red” they say we said “green” and if we say that, just like the Government of Syria and the SSNP say, that we want unity of Syria …then we are accused of advocating partition. Ghassan, as a Syrian, has the right to think about difficult issues for Syria and write. Non Syrians might have an opinion, but this campaign was just unbelievable.

So what was said on 21 to 22 March in the pm that was shared? This was supposed to be incriminating of Ghassan! I wonder if anyone actually analyses the rants against us!
I am responding to a “friend” about Ghassan’s article.

“My dear you said this "Ghassan made a big mistake supporting this Federalization attempt which is contrary to the Majority of Syrian's will”

“There is NO way on the planet, not in the entire universe that Ghassan supports this and ALL he said was that if this federalisation were to happen we could take advantage of it.”

“Ghassan lived his entire life in a family that tried to reunite greater Syria. His dad went to jail for four years for this and maybe about 26 other times was jailed and tortured for his work in reunification. He knows all about these kind of strategies on the ground and in reality as you have also experienced.”

“A good strategist has to be able to look at situations and turn them into opportunities to his advantage. And as in Ghassan's article if you examine it a little closer, you will see that he is clearly saying that he is NOT in support of this move but that, nevertheless, there is a silver lining there and if this autonomy does materialise we have two options: (1) Either use that silver lining to our advantage or (2) sit back, cry that we are victims and do nothing and therefore allow this federation issue to really become a division and a partition.”

”If you can't see that this is what Ghassan's article is about then I think you need to re-read it.”

”I am not sure if you are close to Ghassan's age...but he is 61 and there was never a time in his life where he lived in peace, harmony and stability. I assume you had some of those good years under Yugoslavia?”

”He has a sixth sense about politics in the entire region. The day he heard about "Arab Spring" in Egypt and Libya he had a feeling that this was going to be a big thing for Syria.”

”So I can really hear you about your incredible experiences but I haven't even scratched the surface of Ghassan's personal experiences.”

”He did not write that article because he likes the ideas in it - he was writing in a realistic manner based on his observations and experiences and in dealing with realities especially about the much needed and missing ability in the region of trying to turn adversity into an opportunity where the only other option is surrender.”

”Of course the Syrian government must prevent this model but this is about the case if it is not preventable”

”It is not about manipulation of Turkish Kurds it is about Kurds on both sides making a comparison about who has better rights and lifestyle.”

”The Kurds will support whoever supports them and of course they were in the past and there will be elements of them who go with Israel and USA. If the federation thing did happen and Syria can not prevent that then you go and do a big propaganda job and win them over.”

”Forget about politics, communism and NATO...people left East Germany and went to West Germany because they believed they would get a better life. People will gravitate towards a better the event of this awful federation scenario happening a plan can be made to turn that plan upside down and that is ALL that the article was on about.”

”Did you know that Iran is the biggest winner of that terrible invasion of Iraq. How? Because the Iranians stood back, they knew that America will not be able to control the ground, stepped in later on with their diplomacy and contacts and turned the whole scenario to their advantage. Now this is strategic thinking. This doesn't mean that they took part in the war, or supported it or it doesn;t mean that they were not worried that USA would achieve all its objectives...all of these possibilities were on the table. So they just waited for the right moment and gradually stepped in. This is strategic thinking.”

”And this does not mean we want the same to happen in Syria that happened in Iraq, but to demonstrate how you can turn your enemies plots against them.”

*Now, let me tell you what a well known and respected senior Syrian had to say in late March this year to all this silliness
This Syrian said
“---, I have read Ghassan Kadi's articles as well as your responses. I have made comments of the subject in various posts of mine which I would like to summarize here so that you become aware of my point of view.

First, The possibility for the Syrian Kurds to separate does not exist as long as Syria is not invaded, then divided by a hostile foreign power.

Second, No one, including the Syrian government has a crystal ball to pre-determine the will of the majority of Syrians, and no one has the power to exclude the Kurdish issue from the Syrian national debate, including the illusory proposed federation, which will be given careful and serious consideration before the adoption of a new constitution

Finally, it is unfair to accuse proponents or opponents of a 'Kurdish federation' argument, because federations, as you know, do not necessarily mean separate, independent states. Given Ghassan's argument, it is demonstrably an over-reaction to accuse Ghassan of "advocating' the breakup of Syria.

Thanks for your interest in Syria's history and future.”

Federalism Issue Part Two
Why the Attack on the SSNP?
*The SSNP is in partnership with the Syrian Government and it’s a really important alliance. The history and philosophical platform of the SSNP is the very last of any party in the region that would advocate any partition of Syria and if you want to know what it considers as Syrian original boundaries here is the map attached below.

*Why did the “geopolitical analyst” write a whole article accusing the SSNP of advocating partition? Was it purely written to just discredit Ghassan? Is that possible? If that was the case, the “analyst” shot himself in the foot as the SSNP had to deal with him.

*The whole theory of the article was based on two supposedly “incriminating” pieces. Ghassan’s was the main one which even had a link to it in the body of the “analyst’s article” which I think was removed. It is
The second article is some Foreign Policy magazine that attempted to link the SSNP with USA and that they were secretly working together, something so impossible!

*So, the “geopolitical analyst” based his theory on a lie he put in the mouth of Ghassan, considered him an SSNP member just because of his father’s background, and then made a whole lot of generalisations and fantasy and then…turned it into SSNP party policy!

*The “analyst” never presented any evidence or a link to any SSNP official declaring that they support federalism! But he wanted to convince the audience that it was the case!
Why? What was he trying to achieve and why?
Was it simply a miscalculated attempt to stain Ghassan’s reputation or to stain the reputation of the SSNP or to create divisions or all these?

*Just recently the same analyst stated that he thought Iran was about to betray Syria and support the ousting of President Assad and some kind of Federalisation. He says many wild things about other countries and situations where usually he says they are traitors of some sort. He said this about the Cuban government without providing solid proof, and accusing India of backstabbing BRICS and many good Indian academics totally disagree.

*I have no idea what this young man’s agenda truly is and I was a great friend to him and can not fully understand what has happened. We did share with him our concerns about some of his inflammatory articles that could spark racism or,in an earlier instance, sectarianism. But we always felt he was close enough for us to be open with him. I hold a lot of his secrets and even though he wants to hurt us, who knows why, I am not going to stoop to his level and reveal things that could really hurt his career or cause extreme embarrassment.

*An interesting fact: before Ghassan published his first article about Kurds, amongst other things, Ghassan and I used to have almost daily communications with the “analyst”. There was a healthy exchange of ideas and information sharing. We often asked eachother questions about certain issues. The moment Ghassan published the first article called “Kurdish Autonomy: Partition or Master Plan?” All of this stopped, overnight. Instead of communicating privately about it as we normally would, in a matter that sought clarification etc., the tone suddenly changed and even though Ghassan’s letters to him fully explained that this was not about advocating partition, the “analyst” remained committed totally to his stand.

*Ghassan took this article to many people for independent assessment and they all concurred with him that the article was very clear about its message and that it did not advocate partition in any matter, shape or form.

*If there was any need for anyone to provide an explanation to the other, the onus was on the “analyst” to explain why he made his sudden, unwarranted, unexplained and stubborn knee jerk backflip.

*At this stage I see this “analyst” surrounded by the likes of an anti-Russian “troll” and Christian-Zionists, the likes of which we have been discussing recently, and notably a deeply hateful right wing, domineering friend who has no business with Syria. They all are currently engaged in pursuing quite extraordinary efforts to defend a particular Christian-Zionist. It is truly bizzare.

*For more information on my research into Christian-Zionists you can visit Ghassan’s or my page and there are about 6 different posts from myself, Ghassan, and two others. They are also in Redline Syria but it is easier to find on our personal walls.

Threatening A Young Activist In Syria.
*Where is the evidence that Ghassan and/or I threatened this Syrian?

*The Syrian Activist apparently showed “proof” by posting a profile of someone who sent a message in Arabic about “slaughtering” the “Alawite”. That was her proof and it now becomes fact?

*The last person in the world I ever thought would attack me was this Syrian. I had almost no relationship with her other than now and then “liking” her posts and saying something complimentary about her work.

*Prior to that, maybe in 2013, or some time like that, I was asked by a friend to give the Syrian (who I did not know) some feedback about how to present herself in her videos.

*I gave some feedback and also alerted her (and others did too apparently) to stay away from the group who work at degrading confidence in Syria’s allies but she obviously did not take that advice.

And this is all.

*There was NO personal talk about myself. I gave my feedback and noticed she decided to get close to those elements and stood right back instead, on some occasions “liking” her videos and giving an encouraging comment here and there but never “liking” her articles in that odious publication of the detractors of Syria’s allies.

*So why did this Syrian activist suddenly attack me? Her statements are contradictory about the threats Ghassan and I supposedly made, the supposed statements I made to her about myself and the Federalisation statements are just not correct. They are confused and jumbled as if just plucked from the air or just repeated without actual cognition.

*I noticed the Serbian person’s (who released his and my private conversation) had been involved heavily behind the scenes and then very publicly in attacks as fabrications on us and also the “analyst” wildly liking everything despite knowing the truth about us. The Christian- Zionist and her fan base were involved as well and a handful of others who over the years we exposed and questioned their loyalty to Syria. They all of sudden formed an alliance to attack us. The irony here is that just prior to that half of them did not even speak to the other half but then they suddenly found, in our articles, a threat to their stature in the on-line Syria support community.

*So they put their differences aside and decided to attempt to lynch us. And, when they had nothing of substance to say, they resorted to fabricating stories and exposing our identities in the hope that they would harm us badly and irreversibly. They have no qualms at all about siding with enemies of Russia and Christian-Zionists, all whilst they claim to be defenders of secular and independent Syria.

*When Ghassan wrote his article on The Saker warning about the encroachment of Christian-Zionists on the Syrian Orthodox community, those alleged defenders of Orthodoxy were gobsmacked. They were neither able to find any flaw in this argument, nor were they honourable enough to endorse it. So, they went silent. And even now that they go back to previous articles and accuse Ghassan of endorsing “federalisation”, they remain to date unable to make any comments about that very dangerous encroachment on Orthodoxy and, instead of looking into this serious issue, they are turning a total blind eye to it, and even worse, they are trying to muzzle the debate about the incursion of Western Evangelism into Syria.

Why the turnaround against us of that “analyst”?

Why insist on misinterpreting Ghassan’s work?

Why initially regard Ghassan’s article as an official SSNP manifesto?

Why believe unsubstantiated lies that we have sent death threats to other activists?

Why go through the trouble or editing and cherry picking bits and pieces from different articles, that have no relevance to each other, and then bundle them up together to make them look as one, and try to use this to incriminate us?

Why line up with haters of Russia?

Why cast doubts about strategic allies of Russia?

Why overlook the dangers that Syrian Orthodoxy can be facing?

Why cover up for a Western Christian-Zionist Church that blatantly supports Israel and makes Christian faith conditional upon loving Israel?

*Morally speaking, all “evidence” that the “analyst” and his henchmen and women have presented has been based on lies and deception.

*Ideologically speaking, the intents of the “analyst” and his henchmen and are in total disaccord with the global political left and the anti-Empire movement. What is also interesting to see is that the attack we have faced uses tactics and has the hallmarks of the Western MSM (mainstream media) of editing, lying, fabricating and slandering.

*Religiously speaking, the actions of the “analyst” and Co do not seem to give any care or attention to Orthodoxy as they claim to do.

*Finally, legally speaking, in a court of law, the stands and actions of the “analyst” and his henchmen and women are considered defamatory to say the least. Such actions are illegal. Ghassan and I reserve the right to take legal action against the “analyst” and his major henchman in accordance with the laws of the countries of their residence.

*Those critters will not silence us. They can go to any height and depth in their support of each other. They can scratch each-others’ sores and hope that they will find a way to intimidate us and “frighten” us. We pity them because we know that they have nothing against us; nothing but lies, and soon they will run out of more lies they can fabricate.

*Soon, they will fall against each other, like they did in the past, and instead of scratching sores, they will be snarling and biting one another. And after they fall apart, each will find enough rope to hang him/herself.

On the surface, the actions of the “analyst” carry the tag of attention-seeking and career-building at any cost, including risking legal action. At a deeper and ideological level however, I conclude by saying to him and his supporters that THEY ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE A LOT OF EXPLAINING TO DO; NOT US!

Here is the original link to the Facebook Post

Sunday, July 23, 2017


Over a year ago, after many experiences of the issue discussed in the articles attached below, I decided to write about it and Ghassan did a follow up on it. The issue is about one of the forms of Orientalism that Syria has been subjected to. These two articles, one written by myself and the other by Ghassan, published in early 2016, caused a huge stir from the very people who are claiming they have no part in being Orientalists, Gatekeepers, Evangelists or Subverters. First, one of the characters, published it on her own blog and others wrote in to say how wonderful the article was and that they agreed with me. But rapidly when it sunk in what this article really said, the mode of reaction switched from "I'm sharing/publishing this to prove it is not about me", to damage control and then to outright attack. As they moved from one mode to another, they exposed themselves even more.

Under threat was their freehand they had been given to drown out the intelligent, diverse, local knowledge, lived history of indigenous writers who they could not secure or keep under their control. Instead they continued to flood the alternative media with repetitive, low quality news and analysis and one particular topic, which although the terrorists are almost destroyed, continues to be played repeatedly like a scratched old record. It is this event which really brought it home for many of us Syrians/Levantines and family members as to what was going on. Cheap, repetitive, catchy news was to be circulated widely and to impregnate the venues that supposedly are to give voice to the nation under attack.

We have learnt over the years about the varied and innovative forms the Empire has in waging war on "non-compliant" nations. With the explosion of activism using social media, millions and millions of dollars were injected into perverting it, controlling it, obstructing it and channelling it in the direction the Empire prefers. We have heard this about so many movements that ordinary, caring people support in the belief that it is a genuine cause only to find out that Soros and other specialists in this war strategy have cornered most of the protest movements all over the globe!

Our movement, since at least mid 2013, has been cornered, subverted and re-directed and the Syrians who took a lead in our online movement (talking about the English language one) either are part of this or were too inept to wake up to this and do something about it. The biggest offender, if truly a patriot, let it all slide due to personal failings of ego and vindictiveness.

Whilst the Palestine cause has had many decades of experience in working with Solidarists and with the West, this was all a new thing for Syria, a nation that only a few years before the War on Syria began was pretty much isolated from the rest of the Western world. Empire, knew this and knew that they could easily recruit a whole army to subvert the online fight. Even in the last few months a flood of new FB profiles are out and about making quite sophisticated pro-Syria posts, when only a while ago their profile has years and years of posts that are totally apolitical, sometimes totally banal and mindless and then, suddenly on an appointed day, they become hard core activists! What's the pay scale? Is there such a high degree of unemployment in some of the Western countries that undercover work as a purported activist is seen as lucrative work?

So we from the actual patriotic Syrian community, stand up and speak out, against the tide, warning about the continuation of the Empire's strategy to control the region including that of the alternative media. So it is the usual business; kill the people, try to unseat the government, and control the narrative from those people!

and Ghassan Kadi's follow up on this.

Recently a member of the Syrian Orthodox Clergy also expressed similar concerns to that which Ghassan did and here is his interview.

Here is an interesting article about the social media manipulator employees. It doesn't delve into the more tricky and pernicious problem of infiltration and tainting of alternative media and the protest political movements but it gives a good background. And, to think that when the whole world stands up against Syria and we find a successful on-line defence group, anyone who denies that such a group would not be infiltrated by agents and trolls, then they would have to be very, very naïve or worse!

Monday, July 17, 2017


By Intibah Kadi"17 July 2017
A few of us warned about this over a year ago and the perpetrators and their tiny group of weak minded (or worse) Syrian supporters tried, but failed to shoot the messengers.

The organization the patriarch heads has got a lot of grants from UNHCR and FAO among other bodies for projects and all this is done by highly competent and professional Syrians; but you wouldn't ever hear about the thousands of Syrians who are doing great things. Interestingly if the "hijackers", "gatekeepers", "orientalist", opportunists and outright agents hear these Syrians do projects with UN funds etc they will most likely condemn them!

We in the English language Syrian pages who stayed on trying to salvage the online movement have spoken out repeatedly about what's going on. Much of this can be traced back to the disgraceful betrayal of a few Syrians who took on leadership of the online English language Syrian cause and were utterly responsible for enabling these agents to disrupt, hijack and redirect our social media movement in order to neutralise this part of the fight back strategy (via social media) of Syria. This is how the empire works.

The empire works in this way using a hierarchy of operatives, with the bottom rung often being unaware of their role in this hierarchy and just happy about the attention and free run of their colonialist, orientalist egos where they can pursue their own organisations agenda, their personal one too.

A few steps up the ladder the more smart ones take on a few pet topics which they flood the social media platform with, drowning out any other news or stories and indigenous writers/reporters that they don't have control over.

As they hijack and completely take over the space and the Syrians retreat, leaving a few who for various reasons stay around, they build up a narrative about themselves and present themselves as saviours and that without them Syria would cease to exist!

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

THE MUSLIM SPRING TAKE II By Ghassan and Intibah Kadi 6 July 2017

By Ghassan and Intibah Kadi
6 July 2017

In a previous article titled “A Muslim Spring” published on the Saker, on the 12th of June 2017, the analysis of the then recent Qatar standoff took us into the direction of whether new Middle Eastern alliances were taking form and old ones dismantling.
Developments since then reveal that the distinctive parts of the new embryos are already differentiating and emerging. The initial article foresaw the formation of two new alliances in this manner:


By Intibah Kadi
11 July 2017

Earlier on in the War on Syria, an Israeli operative, an academic at the time based at Haifa University, filled his 5000 friends quota on FB with as many Syrians and their supporters as he could. He wrote private messages to all those he thought were Alawites. He made a private group for Alawites and Jews. He accidentally wrote to a Syrian Christian inviting her to his group and when she said she was Christian he apologized, saying it was only for those two groups.  My friend sent me the screenshots. They are placed below along with the cover details of the academic and his sneaky post in a patriotic Syrian group.

I did some research on this person and found out that he has written academic and policy position papers on how Israel can bring closer to them the Alawites and offer them a “better” alternative than being with their Sunni brothers. Here are some of his titles:
“The Alawites and Israel” and in the article says
“The current regime in Syria, terrified of a Sunni takeover, might appeal to the Jewish state for help…From personal contact with Alawites, I know that they are already beginning to discuss the possibility of appealing to Israel for help. If they do – and they probably will at some point – and the international community does not help them, Israel should step in to aid the Alawites, which would also mean helping their Shi’ite allies, who will by that point be similarly embattled .” 

We have had other nefarious characters all the way from Moscow to parts of the USA come among us, trying to sow sectarian discord and lies, trying to spark a nightmarish Sunni-Shia war. This attempt of the Israeli academic really puts it all out there quite openly whilst others have been far more covert, or so they think!

The academic now works for a think tank associated with a Tel Aviv based university and appears to be climbing up the strategic ladder and that of national significance. He is one of the creative thinkers on how to advance Israel’s strategies.

Fortunately, this Israeli academic underestimated his targets in Syria and he gave up eventually. So, his next target became the people of South Sudan. The people who have for years now been telling stories to deaf ears of incredible atrocities perpetuated against them because they are either Christians or Animists. It seems the Israel academic hit the jackpot with these people and that his strategies are powerfully assisting the Israeli government to get into the heart of the intelligentsia, government departments, UN officials of South Sudan.
That was obviously the plan for Syria as well!

So to add the 5000 new South Sudan contacts on his FB page this academic had to drop all his Syrian ones (and Syria supporters). However he kept TWO. The interesting thing about these two contacts is that one is a proven operative of a cult, known to have engaged in efforts to convert Syrians, obsessed with getting intelligence, as typical of that cult which is still stuck in the days-gone-by mindset of the Cold War, a cult that built enormous armament and other business interests that intersect with the many dangerous entities that cause mayhem and murder on this planet, including a history of collaboration with US Intelligence.

This particular individual from a cult, the remaining friend of this Israeli academic, curiously, like a number of other proven nefarious characters, has cover and protection from a club who came as “friends” to defend Syria but who seem committed more to assuring their survival for their particular aims and objectives. At times we see them engaging in bizarre acts related to mutually assured support and no one dares ask the pertinent questions in case they get cauterized liked the Kadis did (and survived only to become stronger) in order to prevent the infection of “truth” spreading to those who need to hear it.

That cult member who remains on the Israeli academic’s list of friends, in the past became inconsolably hysterical when faced with the prospect of losing the money launderer of the project as he was being outed for his antics and wild stories. The most surprising was the reactions from a few others to this unravelling and, that is when the red flag went up. A host of other “friends” of Syria came from nowhere, like angry wasps swatting at myself, Ghassan and others who were busy completing the parts of the jigsaw puzzle that we gained from the tall stories in the private messages we had been given. Predictably, in times of war and hardship, a “useful boy” can be found who feels no concern about collaborating with these characters for as long as he got what he needed. Some others who used him no longer are allowed visas for Syria and others are under investigation.

The second one this Israeli operative academic kept has a Facebook profile adorned with Syrian flags and a Jewish sounding surname who also, like the cult member, has been busy defending the many shady and questionable “friends” of Syria in what seems to be a “you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” arrangement.

Why, whenever nefarious characters emerge and are exposed, a particular grouping of “friends” of Syria rush to protect them aggressively, is anybody’s question, as the variety and contradicting sets of agendas these “supporters” possess is mind blowing and mind boggling. The mutual support they display indicates a banding together to protect their individual agendas from being exposed, and they morphed into what is best described as soldier ants! Their attempts to silence and shut down patriots who obstruct their paths is futile and will only backfire as they fumble and make mistakes under the covert gaze of those patriots with keen observation skills.

As with the Israeli academic’s strategies, it is all about getting into the heart of the country and its institutions, via social media contacts, finding recruits, getting on with the sneaky divide and rule tactics, in order to achieve whatever aim has been set.  We have seen other examples of “friends” coming to us, whispering words we want to hear but in private uttering ugly sectarian words, and being completely caught out and then defended by the cohort group. 
Very strange “friends” of Syria indeed, “friends” for the unaware or naïve only!

Monday, July 3, 2017


By Ghassan Kadi
In The Saker, 3 July 2017
"In an article published on the Saker titled “Kurdish Autonomy; Partition or Masterplan”, and as the unsavoury prospect of establishing an independent Kurdish state in Syria was taking form, I emphasised that this scenario is avoidable, and at worst, if it had to happen, and if all cards were played correctly, then a seemingly impending disaster could be turned around and that any potential harm could be mitigated. The first of many conditions I had put for this turn around to be successful, was that Syrian Kurds should stay under the roof of Damascus" (Ghassan Kadi)

Thursday, June 29, 2017

TRUMP'S SHOW-ME-THE-MONEY WORLD TOUR: By Ghassan Kadi, 2 June 2017

TRUMP'S SHOW-ME-THE-MONEY-WORLD TOUR: By Ghassan Kadi, 2 June 2017

Recently Ghassan has written many articles and some of them were seen as more urgent than others for publication on The Saker. This one was in the queue but keeps dropping out! It's here for anyone interested.


By Ghassan Kadi
2 June 2017

In my previous article titled “Al-Saud’s Only Gamble Option”, the focus of the analysis was Saudi Arabia, and how it was coerced to pave for Trump a golden highway or face dire consequences. But the game that Trump has more or less successfully played in Riyadh (pending Congress approval to the huge arm’s deal), is only a single act in a multi-act play that Trump is trying to enact with the rest of the world. For some reason however, the world does not seem to be reading Trump correctly.

As more evidence emerges, it is becoming increasingly clearer that the twists and turns that we have learned to experience from Trump are all financially motivated. The odds that favour any other speculation do not stack up in a manner that forms a comprehensive view.

Certainly, some analysts and observes are happy to simply see Trump as a madman and that he doesn’t know what he is doing. I beg to differ, and I see clear and obvious footprints in Trump’s recent overseas tour, and which should for fairness be dubbed; Trump’s show-me-the-money world tour.

It wasn’t by accident that Trump made of Riyadh his first stop. That strategy boosted the pathetic vulnerable ego of the Saudis. On the negative flipside of this, they were put on the spot, unable to gauge what reaction to give to his request of a whole third of a trillion dollar arm’s deal other than submission, with a smile, because they need those weapons to finish the war in Yemen and be able to stand up against Iran. 

In choosing Saudi Arabia as his first stop, Trump was also using his unsuspecting hosts to send a message to his future hosts; EU/NATO partners. The message was: You’re next.

His request that other NATO members lift their contributions was not received very warmly. The fact that Merkel was quick to announce that the EU should rely more on itself for its own defence, comes with a clear message that behind the scenes; Trump’s price was higher than a home-grown force to replace NATO down the track.

Then came Trump’s renegement of the Paris climate deal. This is yet another mere economic decision that will give American industries and economy the benefit of unfair advantage. But Trump cares only about money. This is how he led his life and succeeded in business.

Certainly, the EU/NATO leaders are not as foolish and/or desperate as their Saudi counterparts. They can and did give Trump the cold shoulder.

In every stop he made, every step he takes and every promise he breaks, every twist he makes, Trump’s actions and inactions are all centered on one single issue; financial pragmatism as perceived by the eyes of a businessman. This again points to the state of desperation of the American economy and its uncompetitive status quo.

America is no longer able to excel on a level playing field in its trading with other nations. It must therefore capitalize on its remaining edge; military prowess and hardware industry. It will use those advantages to put itself in positions of unfair advantage, and to bully other nations into doing military business with them.

It is for this reason and this reason alone that America sees Russia as a huge threat, not because Russia is interfering in Ukraine and/or American elections as alleged, but because America can only bully its way in by means of maintaining what is left of its status as the single superpower of the post USSR ‘New World Order’. But that order is no more, and the USA must always conjure up new ways to stay on top of the military industries.

China is Trump’s other huge nightmare, because China is not only an emerging military giant, but certainly an economic one. 

It is most ironic that America’s stand on South China Sea is done in the name of protecting trade routes. No nation on earth has a vested interest in protecting those particular routes more than China itself; after all, they are China’s trade routes, and for every shipping container that moves across those waters into China, at least ten move the other way, brining China wealth and more global significance.

To be fair to Trump, if he deserves any fairness at all, he has come to the stark realization that the innovative nature of American industrial economy is a thing of the past, and for him to stick to the election promise of jobs, jobs, jobs, he has to play dirty. With a decaying infra-structure, rusted factories and insufficient number of highly qualified and self-motivated young technicians, an American techno resurgence is unfathomable, and for Trump to create jobs and put the economy back on track, the only trick up his sleeve is to be a bully.

Given that America has no concrete reason for its anti-Russia and anti-China moves, it must create some to feed the media and the masses. This is a new-age unprecedented form of piracy. In the past, up till recently, nations were at least more transparent in demonstrating their reasons for war against each other, and the rule of the game was always for the stronger and more advanced nation to be in the position of having the upper hand. America however is not in a position to make admissions that it is in the process of conjuring up stories against Russia and China because it has lost its competitive edge; not whilst Trump is claiming to be making America great again. Such an admission would be tantamount to an athlete admitting that he cannot win without performance enhancement drugs. But such actions are actions of desperation and they cannot go very far. 

A few years ago, I wrote an article titled “How Far Will a Desperate Radical America Go?”
. I predicted that such an America will likely blackmail other nations in a manner that coerces them to do business under the threat of nuclear attacks should they refuse. We have not seen this come to pass, but down the track, with more audacious advances from Trump and future presidents, this possibility cannot be zeroed out, because America will not sit down and watch its economy and world domination fall to pieces.

A few years ago also I predicted that one day America will elect a president that will make George W. Bush look like mother Teresa. I am not sure if Trump is that president, perhaps close. And now, it is not hard to predict that one day America will elect a president that will make Trump look like Socrates.

Editor's note:
Hear Trump for yourself

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

A MUSLIM SPRING By Ghassan Kadi 12 June 2017

By Ghassan Kadi
12 June 2017

Ghassan’s take on the fallout of the Qatar crisis and its possible wider implications


By Ghassan Kadi
11 June 2017
When President Assad and the gallant Syrian Army decided that Syria was to stand up against the multi-national conspiracy against her, fought against all odds, certain of victory but preferred to risk to go down standing rather than surrendering long before she earned the respect and support of friends who eventually came to her aid, she had nothing up her sleeve other than her redlines.

Those redlines were and still are underpinned by her sovereignty and integrity, and her laws that reflect those principles.

Like all other nations and states, it is up to Syria and Syria alone to decide what her redlines are, and in times of crisis, when friends come to one’s aid, Syria is not alone in expecting her friends and supporters to know and understand what her redlines are; otherwise, how on earth can those friends and supporters discern where the defence lines would be drawn and what to uphold?

Not even Syria’s President would cross those redlines, and the very reason why he received so much popular support, why the overwhelming majority of Syrians stood by him and regarded him as the voice, the embodiment of all of what is good in Syria, why the Syrian Army remained defiant against all odds, and why Syria won her war, was because President Assad has set the precedent, the perfect example as he cherished and symbolized Syria’s unwavering principles, redlines, and the laws that define those principles and redlines.

It is therefore most unacceptable for patriotic Syrians to see supposed supporters trying to impose what their own redlines are; not only on other people who are meant to be supporters, but on the nation as a whole.

Until the laws of Syria change, if they change by the natural course of the democratic process that is in place, those laws need to be respected and adhered to, just like the laws of any other nation. And if and when those laws change, they will change in accordance with the will of the people; not in accordance with the fantasies and agendas of couch activists, personal profile builders, fund-thirsty opportunists, gate-keepers, propagandists and religious freaks and zealots of different descriptions.

And when any of such suspicious characters are not Syrian, if they have any integrity at all, they must understand that there is a bigger onus on them to stay away from the law-making process of Syria; because this is a matter for Syrians and not for them. And if they truly support Syria, they should be demanding to stay out of imposing their own vision, but do they?

The true friends of Syria do, and they are highly appreciated for their unconditional support, but those who pretend to be friends are in a totally different paradigm.

Some alleged supporters of Syria, alleged Syrian patriots or otherwise, think that they have a mandate to decide how to stretch the laws of Syria and put themselves in a position to decide what laws can be stretched and broken. Among other things, they believe that they have the right to decide what constitutes a breach of Syrian laws even when it comes to matters relating to national security; including matters that relate to the steadfast position of Syria against Israel.

What is more ironic and most audacious is that those same people accuse anyone, including genuine Syrian patriots, who question their self-given mandate to break Syrian law as enemies of Syria. Inadvertently and perhaps subconsciously, they are referring to those patriots as personal enemies, only and simply because they feel challenged by them as they expose their agendas.

But redlines can only be seen by people of colour vision and those who are able to discern red from black. But those with colour blindness are only able to see a reflection of their own shades of grey and confusion.

It is not within the power or mandate of anyone to make claims about what Syria should accept, who to allow on her soil, what should be deemed acceptable and not acceptable by Syria; outside what is stipulated within Syrian law.
To those who believe they are above Syria’s law, we say: Hands off Syria.

QATAR AND THE FORTY THIEVES By Ghassan Kadi 8 June 2017

by Ghassan Kadi
8 June 2017

This article analyses the events leading up to the underlying reasons and ironies of the farcical situation of Qatar being declared a terrorist state.
"The sudden, unprovoked and coordinated outrage of Middle East regional powers, as well as international powers, against Qatar is something akin to a story in “Fables de La Fontaine”. With a bit of a twist, it resembles the story of “The Animals Seized with the Plague”."QATAR QQQQ

Wednesday, June 7, 2017